Discussion to One More #290 (regarding symmetries in str8ts)

Klaus
Posts: 27
Joined: Friday 15. January 2016, 11:57

Re: Discussion to One More #290 (regarding symmetries in str

Post by Klaus » Monday 8. February 2016, 17:29

Thanks hone,

i think i finally understand what you have done and meant.

but i'm still not sure how much sense it makes to examine a grid, from which is known that there are multiple solutions, by using UR-elimination, which is only valid if the grid has a unique solution.

it seems to me you have created a new variation of Str8ts, with the additional rule that UR-elimination is allowed, no matter if its justified from the original rules or not.

Post Reply